Eye-opening debate erupts over what it means to be 30 today vs in 2004

Eye-opening debate erupts over what it means to be 30 today vs in 2004
Source: Newsweek

Another iconic Hollywood movie has announced a reboot -- and it has already kicked off a generational debate online.

The 2004 coming‑of‑age romantic comedy 13 Going on 30 starring Jenna Rink, played by Jennifer Garner, an awkward middle schooler who makes a desperate wish to be "thirty, flirty and thriving" on her 13th birthday after being taunted by classmates.

Her wish comes true when she magically wakes up 17 years in the future, trapped in the body of a 30‑year‑old woman with a high‑powered magazine job and a glamorous New York life -- only to discover that adulthood is far more complicated than she imagined.

More than two decades later, Netflix has confirmed plans for a reboot. Emily Bader, who starred in People We Meet on Vacation, and Logan Lerman are set to lead the new adaptation, with Garner returning as an executive producer. Plot details have not yet been revealed. Newsweek reached out to Netflix's press office for comment via email.

But, even without concrete story information, the announcement has prompted social media users to question whether the central fantasy of wanting to be 30 resonates the same way it did in the early 2000s -- particularly for Gen Z and Gen Alpha audiences who grew up watching millennials struggle through economic instability, burnout and delayed milestones.

A Threads user called @mintminaka argued the premise now feels outdated: "This movie wont make sense with this current ageist generation. In the original the main girl wishes to be 30 yrs old because she's tired of being an awkward 13 yr old and wants to fast forward to when she is 'thirty flirty and thriving'. Gen z/alpha teens nowadays would kill themselves if they woke up as a 30 yr old they think its hag retirement age."

Others pushed back strongly against that interpretation. Anaweesa, a comedian and artist, wrote: "God, can we stop the age wars? They're so stupid. I'm 26, Gen Z and I loved this movie. Gen Z & Gen Alpha are VERY different. I can't wait to be 30. I don't think it should be rebooted because reboots are unoriginal, but you gotta stop with these takes."

Part of the disagreement reflects confusion -- and frustration -- around generational labels themselves.

Millennials are generally defined as those born between the early 1980s and mid‑1990s, while Gen Z typically includes people born from roughly 1997 to the late 2000s. Gen Alpha is considered to begin around 2010, though researchers stress that hard cutoff dates don't truly exist and that generational traits are shaped by culture, technology, economics and world events as much as birth year.

That nuance was echoed by multiple commenters. "Bro thinks gen z isnt already pushing 30 lmao [laughing my a off]," said Kat (@absolutekatastrophe).

"Gen alpha is also considered to start 2010, hard ranges for generations don't exist and generational labels are arbitrary. traits are influenced by so many factors than just birth years," wrote Jonathon Aimoto.

Others pointed out that the fantasy of escaping adolescence hasn't disappeared -- if anything, it still hits close to home.

"First of all 30 is millennial age still. Second, I definitely hated being 13 and wished to skipping to when I was 30 and finally starting my life," shared Karlie Star.

"This year is the last year that 30 year olds are classified as millennials. From next year, they'll be Gen Z," added Nathan Fisher.

Some users even joked that the reboot could take on a darker tone given how adulthood looks in 2026. "Maybe this version could be a horror movie, waking up in his 2026 and all the s* that comes with it...sounds horrifying to meeee," wrote Catherine.

Another commenter questioned whether the reboot should happen at all: "Gen Z is already almost 30 wtf are you talking about. What will be weird is a grown ma falling in love with a woman with a soul of 13 year old however in this context it makes sense because he sees the girl he always loved. But the old movie was perfect, I don't understand the need to remake everything," shared Shivani Vashi.

The debate arrives amid a broader Hollywood trend of mining nostalgia through remakes, reboots and reimaginings, from Mean Girls and Heathers to Legally Blonde and Freaky Friday. Studios have increasingly revisited early‑2000s titles with built‑in fanbases, betting that familiarity will attract both original viewers and younger audiences discovering these stories for the first time.