The Pentagon vented its fury at Keir Starmer on Monday for his 'pearl-clutching' over the US attacks on Iran. The Prime Minister was accused of undermining the Special Relationship by banning American bombers from using British bases to launch Saturday's assault on Tehran. Sir Keir risked aggravating the White House further by suggesting that the attack, which killed Iran's Supreme Leader, was illegal and set to unravel. In an outspoken intervention, US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth praised Israel for its central role in the offensive - but savaged the legalistic approach taken by Britain and other European allies. 'Israel has clear missions for which we are grateful,' he said. 'Capable partners are good partners. Unlike so many of our traditional partners who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, humming and hawing about the use of force.'
Sir Keir made a partial U-turn on Sunday after Iran lashed out at civilian targets in Gulf states and RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, saying US jets would be able to fly from British bases for the 'limited' objective of destroying Iranian missile launchers and stockpiles. He told MPs on Monday that an estimated 300,000 British nationals in the Gulf region were 'at risk' as Tehran targeted hotels and airports. But he ruled out going further, saying he would not participate in US-led attempts to bring about 'regime change from the skies'. Donald Trump said the PM took 'far too long' to lift the ban on US forces flying from RAF Fairford, in Gloucestershire, and Diego Garcia, in the Chagos Islands. The US President said he was 'very disappointed in Keir' over his attempts to hand sovereignty of the strategically vital Diego Garcia to Mauritius. Sir Keir acknowledged that Mr Trump had 'expressed his disagreement', but insisted it was in Britain's national interest to abide strictly by international law.
He told MPs repeatedly that any military action had to have a 'lawful basis' and a 'viable thought-through plan' - and suggested the US had neither. Downing Street said the PM's commitment to upholding international law was 'iron-clad'. Kemi Badenoch suggested that the PM was distancing himself from US actions on Iran to avoid further alienating Muslim voters and so-called 'progressives' who deserted Labour for the Greens in last week's by-election. She accused Sir Keir of trying to placate voters 'whose political loyalties are swayed by conflicts in the Middle East, not the British national interest'.
'It isn't international law or principle,' she said. 'It's pure, partisan, political calculations from a party that has surrendered its right to govern our country.' She added: 'Why is it that under this Prime Minister, international law always seems to be at odds with our national interest?' The Tory leader said British people 'will be wondering why our country's response has been so weak'. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the PM's dithering was 'pathetic', adding: 'Our Prime Minister is not a leader, he's a follower, and he looks weak in the eyes of everybody.'
The row came as: President Trump said the US was 'knocking the [expletive]' out of the Iranian regime - and the 'big wave' of attacks was still to come . Ministers were scrambling to draw up plans for the evacuation of more than 100,000 British nationals who have registered their presence in the Gulf region with the Foreign Office. European gas prices jumped by 52 per cent after Iran targeted production facilities in Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Security sources warned that Tehran has enough missiles and drones to continue terrorising the region for at least another week. The war spread across the tinderbox region, with Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon exchanging fire, and Qatar shooting down Iranian fighter planes. Three US jets were accidentally shot down over Kuwait. Sir Keir hinted he was pressuring Rachel Reeves behind the scenes to increase defence spending more quickly.
The PM marched against the Iraq War in 2003 and declared it illegal. He told MPs on Monday he was determined to prevent Britain being dragged into another legally questionable conflict in the Gulf. 'We all remember the mistakes of Iraq, and we have learned those lessons,' he said. 'Any UK actions must always have a lawful basis and a viable, thought-through plan. President Trump has expressed his disagreement with our decision not to join the initial strikes,' he said. 'But it is my duty to judge what is in Britain's national interest, and that is the judgment I made. I stand by it.' Former Tory security minister Tom Tugendhat, who served in the Iraq war, said there was 'zero comparison' with the current situation as there are no plans for a UK ground invasion, although President Trump later said he was prepared to put 'boots on the ground'. A legal opinion drawn up by the PM's controversial Attorney-General Lord Hermer ruled that the assault on Iran could not be deemed self-defence despite the regime’s long history of attacks on the West, including targets in the UK.