The MP for the Staffordshire Moorlands has criticised plans to merge local councils in the county.
It comes as Reform-led Staffordshire County Council proposed an East-West split for combining existing local authorities in Staffordshire.
The shake-up nationally has been encouraged by the government, which said creating unitary councils would simplify local government, improve services and save taxpayers money.
Conservative MP Dame Karen Bradley said she had written to the new secretary of state about how "we are opposed to being forced into a devolution deal or unitary authority against our will".
Speaking in Parliament, Dame Karen asked for a debate on the reorganisation of local government.
"People of the Staffordshire Moorlands are very concerned that they should have their say about what happens in devolution plans," she said.
The MP has also rejected other devolution options on the table, including a North-South Staffordshire divide, which she argues would force the Moorlands into a "Greater Stoke-on-Trent".
Dame Karen said she did not have a "preferred option" for reorganisation, explaining "I don't like a single one of them".
She added she was determined to fight for the status quo.
"I want to retain what we have, our district council, which has been a very good district council, working very well for the people of the Staffordshire Moorlands," she said.
"If it ain't broke, why fix it?"
The government proposed the introduction of unitary councils, which provide all local services in a given area, as a way of simplifying operations, adding that they would help devolve power away from London.
Reform UK won control of Staffordshire County Council in May and the party has countered a previous proposal of a north-south split by suggesting an east-west one instead.
Under those, an East Staffordshire unitary council would provide services for 689,784 people in the existing footprint of the Staffordshire Moorlands, East Staffordshire, Lichfield, Tamworth and Stoke-on-Trent councils.
Reform argues that given the government's "metrics" this plan is the best and most equal split for business rates and council tax.
However, Reform's deputy council leader, Martin Murray, described the proposals as "insane".
"It is stupid," he said. "It makes no sense. It does not work."
Mr Murray explained that local authorities had not been given a timeline by the government for the formation of a strategic mayoral authority which would oversee whichever new council structure is put in place.
If the plans for an East-West split are agreed at their meeting later this month, the county council will develop a full business case to be submitted to the government in November.