Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights.
Ukraine is ready to deploy its top drone intercept operators to the Middle East, but there's a catch. President Volodymyr Zelensky has conditioned the offer on Gulf leaders persuading Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire of at least two weeks, and potentially two months.
"I would suggest the following: leaders of the Middle East have great relations with Russians," Zelensky said in a Bloomberg interview on March 2. "They can ask Russians to implement a month-long ceasefire."
The proposal came days after Iranian drone and missile strikes hit cities across the region, including Dubai, in retaliation for U.S. and Israeli strikes on Feb. 28 that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several senior officials. Tehran also launched thousands of drones and missiles against Israel and U.S. military assets in Iraq, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar.
The Wall Street Journal reported on March 2 that six U.S. service members were killed. Following a closed-door Congressional briefing on March 3, Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told reporters that administration officials had told lawmakers more Americans would die and that the U.S. would not be able to stop the Iranian Shahed drones.
The Lessons Were There
The warning signs have been visible for years. In 2019, a drone attack claimed by the Houthis forced Saudi Arabia to shut down half its oil production, nearly 5 percent of global output. Now Iran is attempting to scale that strategy. Bloomberg reported on March 2 that Saudi Aramco halted operations at its 550,000 barrel-per-day Ras Tanura refinery after a drone strike in the area.
Since Russia's full-scale invasion, Kyiv has had to grapple with defending itself against a relentless aerial campaign with limited air defense supplies, including scarce Patriot interceptors. By 2025, Russia had scaled drone production to the point of launching hundreds per night against Ukrainian cities.
In December 2025, Mykola Melnyk, a former Ukrainian officer from the 47th Mechanized Brigade, told me,"Right now, our air-defense system simply isn't capable of intercepting everything. The Russians will keep scaling this up and hitting us." Melnyk added,"The main lesson for the U.S. Army isn't just that the enemy has such a weapon - it's that it's cheap and effective."
In a piece I wrote for The National Interest in July 2025, I warned that "even the most expensive systems will struggle to handle the scale and adaptability of drone threats," and that Gulf states needed to look to Kyiv for inspiration. That prediction is now materializing on two fronts simultaneously.
Cost Asymmetry Is the Real Threat
The core problem isn't technology, but economics and scalability. The Associated Press reported in April 2025 that Houthi rebels shot down seven U.S. Reaper drones in under six weeks, inflicting over $200 million in losses in Yemen. "Our adversaries use $10,000 one-way drones that we shoot down with $2 million missiles," said Army Gen. Bryan P. Fenton during a congressional hearing in April 2025. "That cost-benefit curve is upside down."
NATO allies have confronted the same arithmetic in Europe. Poland's Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski, after Russia deliberately flew drones into Polish airspace in September 2025 to test NATO's resolve, put it plainly: "It is uneconomical and impractical to be defending our space with F-35s using Sidewinder missiles against drones."
Jack Watling, a research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, wrote in November 2025 that cheap drones like the Geran - a Russian variant of the Iranian Shahed - complicate air defense by striking targets that don't merit the use of expensive air defenses missiles to protect those targets. Cheap drones can act as decoys that overwhelm air defense systems and exhaust limited missile supplies. Swarms of low-cost drones are able to help punch corridors through defensive umbrellas, clearing a path for cruise and ballistic missiles to follow.
According to a December 2025 study by RUSI, Russian industry cannot replenish stocks of anti-aircraft missiles fast enough to keep pace with Ukraine's drone campaign against military and energy infrastructure. Ukrainska Pravda reported in January 2025 that Russia was forced to pull at least 11 Pantsir-S1 systems away from the front to protect a single drone factory at Alabuga.
Ukraine's former Commander-in-Chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi wrote in a November 2025 column for the Ukrainian outlet LIGA.net that warfare is gradually becoming cheaper thanks to technological advances, even as total strike capabilities continue to grow.
Ukraine's elite Alpha special operations drone unit leveraged the cost asymmetry of cheap strike drones to destroy expensive air defense systems, roughly half of Russia's Pantsir air defense systems in 2025. Ukraine's security service estimated the total value of Russian air defense systems eliminated at around $4 billion - achieved largely with cheap drones.
Serhii Kuzan, chair of the Ukrainian Security and Cooperation Center, told me,"Ukraine has shown that layered, decentralized air defense - combining air defense systems, electronic warfare, cheap interceptors, and mobile teams - is effective." Melnyk said Ukraine would need both interceptor drones and more F-16s working in concert to plug the remaining gaps in its aerial defenses.
Why Ukraine's Offer Carries Real Weight
Since Russia began deploying Iranian-made Shahed-type drones against Ukrainian cities in 2022, Kyiv has tracked and intercepted roughly 57,000 of them, developing layered, low-cost interception networks out of necessity as Western air defense supplies fell short.
In February, Ukraine's top General Oleksandr Syrskyi said that homegrown interceptor drones destroyed more than 70% of Shaheds over the Kyiv region, conducting approximately 6,300 sorties in a single month and taking down more than 1,500 Russian drones of various types.
Ukraine has also developed various interceptor drones, such as the Octopus, priced at roughly $3,000 - a fraction of the cost of the missiles it replaces. In February, Ukrainian media reported that the Octopus is now being licensed for mass production across 16 Ukrainian manufacturers, with the UK signed on to produce several thousand units per month.
The U.S. and its Gulf allies may have overwhelming firepower, but Iran can still inflict serious damage with low-cost drones at scale. They would clearly benefit from Ukraine's hard-won expertise in deploying cheap interceptor drones, adding a cost-effective layer to their existing air defenses.
"Watching our military operate, no one can doubt our offensive operational excellence," wrote Dara Massicot, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment, in a post on X. "But what I see against our bases today, and risks we accepted before today, our military must do more ASAP to institutionalize defensive lessons from Ukraine."
The rapid spread of low-cost drone warfare is forcing militaries to rethink the economics of air defense. It is a war of supply on both fronts, and both sides will struggle to produce enough missiles and interceptors to keep pace.